The Conspiracist's Dilemma

 



Between 1970 and the early 1990s, an estimated 30,000 people in the UK were given blood or blood products infected with HIV or hepatitis C. Some 3,000 died as a direct consequence. An inquiry commenced in 2018 has finally produced its report, and it is damning.

Blood was not routinely tested for HIV until 1986, hepatitis C following 5 years later.  A significant source of the contamination was imported blood, particularly from America which paid donors, incentivising donation from drug users, for example. 

Brian Langstaff's report lays much of the blame for the problem with Government, but medical staff and the NHS as a whole come in for criticism.

All of which will be music to a conspiracist's ears. A nice juicy medical scandal, involving government, undermining trust in the medical profession... those who call for a similar inquiry into harms from vaccination - a call I would not necessarily oppose - will see many parallels,  and vindication of their suspicions that 'they' are never to be trusted.

For a particular flavour of conspiracist, however, this presents a dilemma. Many on the vaccine-sceptic side of the argument have lent their voice to the growing fringe notion that there is no such thing as a virus. No-one ever caused a disease by passing a virus from one person to another, and the things themselves are anyway artefacts; illusions. So, what's the contaminant? What caused these people to develop the diseases, some to die? Why did the contamination stop when they started testing for these specific viruses?

The tests for both HIV and Hep C involve both antibody and nucleic acid tests - the latter presumably PCR. This is the test that PCR inventor and HIV/AIDS denier Kary Mullis is routinely quoted as saying "will find almost anything in anybody". The falsity of his statement can be demonstrated by the fact that we don't throw away 'almost all' blood donations due to false positives. As to antibodies, if viruses don't exist, what are the antibodies antibodies to? Why does the body produce them, and why do they frequently co-occur with specific nucleic acid sequences?

A familiar refrain from the virus denier is that viruses have not been proven according to 'the scientific method'. They imagine that the latter consists solely of experiment (and gloss over the fact that their preferred Terrain Theory has absolutely no experimental support!). The kind of experiment they have in mind is the ethically impossible infection of a healthy volunteer with HIV or Hep C, in a random trial against placebo! Well, that will  never be done for obvious reasons, but here is an 'experiment' inadvertently performed: people were given products contaminated with HIV and Hep C and went on to harbour the virus. Both of these viruses are capable of living in the body for decades.

So, that's the dilemma. If one continues to reject the existence of viruses, this scandal is a complete nothing burger. Government and the NHS have brought themselves into disrepute purely to maintain the wider fiction that viruses are real, and the opportunity to revel in their discomfort must be relinquished. On the other hand, if you want to use this as evidence for the nefariousness of government and medicine, viruses must be accepted as real.

I look forward to people trying to push both buttons simultaneously.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dr John Campbell, the BBC, and Ivermectin

  Dr John Campbell is a retired nurse who has built up a considerable Youtube following with his almost daily videos on the evolving coronavirus pandemic. His approach is ‘evidence-based’; he is pro-vaccine, but also pro-ivermectin, an effective antiparasitic which is being actively investigated for ‘off-label’ use in three principal settings relating to Covid: ‘prophylactic’ (preventative), ‘early-stage’ (keeping mild disease mild) and ‘late-stage’ (helping sick patients avoid the worst outcomes). Ivermectin use in these settings is, to say the least, controversial. A highly vocal group of physicians is convinced by the evidence to date – in all 3 settings – while others, particularly academics, consider the evidence gathered to date to be weak – many small trials with methodological flaws and growing evidence of outright fraud. The demarcation between ‘physician’ and ‘academic’ is not a hard one – many such academics have medical qualifications, and many physicians have a goo...
Read more

Polymerase Chain Reaction and SARS-CoV-2

Image
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) is a powerful technique for detecting the presence of nucleic acids of specific sequence - that is, DNA and RNA: polymers that can be viewed as long 'sentences' in an alphabet of four different 'letters'. By running through cycles of sequence duplication, the quantity of the target sequence approximately doubles with each step, generating sufficient from small initial quantities to be analysed by chemical techniques too insensitive to detect the original quantity. Additionally, because it uses sequence-specific ‘primers’ to start the ball rolling, careful design of these permits a very high degree of sequence specificity.  During the Coronavirus pandemic, much internet chatter and mythology has arisen around this technique, which this article will attempt to address. PCR - a rough guide. PCR was invented by Kary Mullis, a chemist at Cetus Corporation, in 1983. This invention earned him the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1993.  In biol...
Read more

Why Virus Denial Is Wrong

Image
Does this even need saying? That I should even feel moved to write this post, in this day and age, seems extraordinary. But an increasing number of people are latching onto the hoary old idea that there is no such thing as a virus - that virologists have been studying an artefact all this time; a product of the organism rather than an entity hijacking host biology in order to spread between hosts. Or, madder still, the whole field is a 130-year fraud, perpetuated by generations of scientists in order to ... ummm ... something something. Like many positions over the last few years, it is driven by Covid denialism taken to extremes - not only does SARS-CoV-2 not exist, none of them do . This seems a somewhat hyperbolic extension - scepticism over SARS-CoV-2 extended to dismissing the entire science of virology! This puts me in mind of the inhabitants of the planet Krikkit in Douglas Adams's Hitchhiker's Guide upon observing the glories of the Universe for the first time above th...
Read more